Mandatory Masks? LA Times Lied


Posted by Annie in Political on June 20, 2020

We went to Safeway yesterday, and were told the governor had issued a mandatory mask executive order. We told the manager to read the ADA, and went in to the store, completed our shopping, then checked out at the self-checkout.  We were told we wouldn’t be allowed back in.

Well, we came home and searched the internet.  The governor did NOT order mandatory masks and the LA Times lied.  To make things easier, I’ll let the Healthy American, Peggy Hall explain.

Here is part two of her video. 

I just don’t understand why the media is lying to us?  The only place I’ve seen it reported even close to accurate was China in Focus.  How strange.

Tags: , ,

Name change Yosemite


Posted by Annie in Opinion, Political on January 29, 2016

In November the Board of Directors of the Sierra Club, the largest environmental defense group, held a closed section of a board meeting to defund the LeConte Memorial Lodge in Yosemite National Park. According to the by-laws the minutes of any closed section of a meeting have to reveal the outcome and numbers of any vote taken. This by-law was violated.

Exterior of the LeConte Memorial Lodge in Yosemite National Park, California.

Exterior of the LeConte Memorial Lodge in Yosemite National Park, California.

The vote was taken to close the LML and terminate the employment of the curator without including or notifying the volunteer members of the SC who have maintained the interior of the building since it was declared a national historic site in 1987. After an uproar from the volunteers Robin Mann, a director, and Daniel Chu, a SC employee, held a one hour conference call with no announced agenda with 20 volunteers. The volunteers submitted four questions in advance, none of which were answered. Since then volunteers have waged email war with the BOD who have agreed to a follow-up call next Thursday, February 4.

All this started when the Board President, Aaron Mair, and the Executive Director, Michael Brune, sent a letter to the National Park Service requesting the name of LML be changed. The NPS refused. It was a good idea, poorly executed. The volunteers do not object to the name change but do find the SC’s secrecy disturbing. This has been made clear in many emails.

How can an environmental group collect dues and then operate in secrecy? Is this legal?

BTW the LML is the second oldest building in YNP built in 1903. It was the first visitors’ center; Ansel Adams was the curator in the early 1920s. It was named after Joseph LeConte (who had just died) because he along with many others founded the SC. Along with his brother John he was one of the founders of UC Berkeley. Both of them taught in Georgia and owned slaves. LML is NOT named after LeConte because he owned slaves.

It recently was revealed that LeConte wrote racist remarks. This is a surprise to the volunteers. Let me stress again that none of the volunteers object to changing the name. The objection is to the secrecy and the subsequent stonewalling by the board.

Below is an email from volunteers. Can you help us get the BOD’s attention?

Joseph LeConte (1823-1901), American geologist...

Joseph LeConte (1823-1901), American geologist and co-founder of the Sierra Club.

ACTION ALERT:  Please Request the Sierra Club Board of Directors to reconsider transfer of LeConte Lodge to the National Park Service 1-25-16
To: Friends ans Supporters of LeConte Memorial Lodge in Yosemite Valley

From: Vicky Hoover, Elaine Gorman, Cass Devlin, Michael Bryant, Frank (Dusty) Welsh, Harold Wood.

As long-time volunteers and supporters of LeConte Memorial Lodge, we hope you will join us in asking the Sierra Club Board of Directors to reconsider their proposed transfer of the Sierra Club’s LeConte Memorial Lodge to the National Park Service. We have two main arguments for requesting the reconsideration:

First, we believe the decision was made in violation of the board’s own bylaws. Second, new relevant and substantive information has arisen since the BOD made its decision last November.

At LeConte Memorial Lodge, the Sierra Club has an ongoing opportunity unique in the National Park System (and among environmental organizations generally) to not merely tell about the past, but to explain and celebrate the Club’s future – most notably including not only its commitment to protecting national parks and wilderness areas, but also to its commitment to addressing global climate change, and in line with its Diversity and Inclusion goals, the environmental justice movement.

As an environmental education outreach and public relations program, the LeConte Lodge is an invaluable asset of the Sierra Club, which it has proudly maintained for 111 years. Once given up, this intangible, historic asset can never be recovered.

In a conference call on January 22, 2016, 28 of us volunteers and staff learned from Club Vice-President Robin Mann and the BOD had secretly decided back at its November 2015 board meeting to not merely request a name change for LeConte Lodge (which it had decided to do October), but to actually abandon the program entirely and to transfer the LeConte Lodge to the National Park Service. The decision the Board made in November was made in closed session, with limited information. No volunteers were notified about the proposal to abandon the program, or the actual decision to do so, then, and for two months afterward.

Our biggest concern is not merely with the substantive decision that was made, but HOW it was made. It was done in closed session, with no discussion among those involved with the program, which includes the curator, the long-time LeConte Lodge and Yosemite Committee leaders, and the hundreds of Sierra Club members who volunteer for a week every summer at the LeConte Lodge.

The Sierra Club Bylaws do authorize the board to meet in private session “for any reason,” but it must report final action in public session:
5.14. All meetings of the Board of Directors or of any executive committee or of any committee thereof shall be open to attendance by any member of the Club in good standing, but nothing herein shall prevent the Board or any committee from convening in private session for the consideration of any matter; provided, however, the vote or final action shall be taken in open session.

Reviewing the minutes for the November 21, 2015 Sierra Club Board of Directors meeting, we note that the Minutes say only: 12. Le Conte Lodge – closed session

MSC (Black, Chin) the Board moved to go into closed session at 10:49am PT.

The meeting reconvened in open session at 1:07pm PT after a closed lunch session.

We volunteers were told on January 22, 2016 that the BOD had made the decision at its November board meeting to close the Lodge program. But although LeConte Lodge was indeed on the board’s agenda as a closed session, the minutes failed to report that any action was taken at the meeting, much less a decision as momentous as the discontinuing of a program that has been in successful operation for 111 years.

Even if there was no bylaws violation, and even if the issue was perceived merely as a budget item, the issue is too important to the Club’s history, the future of its park advocacy, and the many dedicated volunteers who involved to leave to a closed session.

Vice-President Robin Mann stated that the reason for the delay in notifying volunteeers was to comply with “union” and HR rules. However, Bonnie Gisel, longtime LeConte staff curator, now tells us she was informed on December 7, 2015 of the decision, so there was no reason for delay informing volunteers to late January. And then when volunteers were finally informed, there was not even one word of thanks to those who have given literally decades of their “heart and soul” as volunteers to this unique Sierra Club outreach program in Yosemite.

Thus, we must appeal to the Board of Directors to re-consider their decision, and to do so in an open meeting of the BOD to which volunteers would be invited to participate in the discussion. This decision is too important to be based on limited information in a closed forum. Given the longevity of the program, and its importance as an outreach for the Sierra Club in one of America’s most popular national parks, the LeConte Lodge program is not something to be abandoned lightly.

The board’s decision appeared to be founded originally on concerns about the name “LeConte” for the Lodge, as “Professor Joseph LeConte” shared the very common (now repudiated) 19th century views about race held by many scientists of the day that we now call “scientific racism.”

It is understandable that the Club wishes to distance itself from that name and those views, although we feel exposing past racism and telling the story about how the Club is now committed to environmental justice for all people regardless of race, could actually help, rather than hinder, the Sierra Club’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion goals.

It is the fact that Sierra Club enjoys this remarkable and unique foothold within this spot of tremendous pubic visitation that gives us the opportunity to use the LeConte Lodge as a teaching point against racism as well as in favor of environmental protection.

In any case, the Sierra Club has already requested the NPS to change the name of LeConte Memorial Lodge to something less controversial. The new information relevant to this matter is that it now appears that the NPS is indeed wiling to change the name. So that concern is now addressed. This was something not known when the BOD made its decision in November, so it is only proper that the BOD reconsider its decision.

The only issue now is whether the Sierra Club should continue sponsoring the educational program in Yosemite that it has done since 1904, using a new name for the Lodge.

The value of the (soon-to-be-renamed) LeConte Lodge program is huge. Based upon a few minutes discussion made virtually in a vacuum, the Club BOD decided that it could no longer operate the program when it considers its other priorities. But the LeConte Lodge has been managed by many different Sierra Club entities over the years – by chapters in California, by the California RCC, etc.

We believe the BOD should consider other important options to operating LeConte Lodge other than turning it over to the National Park Service. Some of the possibilities include:

  1. Obtaining sponsorship by another Sierra Club entity outside of National so the Club’s presence can continue, such as Sierra Club California or a chapter. Or consider operating it under a separate 501 (c)(3) under Sierra Club auspices, much like the Club does with the Foundation or other specialized programs. Or set up a Club volunteer team to work with the National Park Service to operate the program, perhaps through the existing Yosemite Committee or as a team under the Our Wild America program.
  2. Setting up a fundraising program to fund the program, which could be small donations by a few hundred people and by chapters and groups within the Club. A mere hundred donors at $1,000 each would easily fund the operating expenses for a year. We note that the Club’s smallest California chapter, the Kern-Kaweah Chapter, pledged $10,000 to the LeConte Lodge; larger chapters could easily afford even more.

We believe the Sierra Club must retain its unique and irreplaceable presence at a (renamed) LeConte Lodge, continuing the educational program it has undertaken since 1904. Moreover, this retraction must be made immediately before the NPS is notified of the board’s decision.

What You Can Do: Please contact the BOD members requesting that they reconsider their decision about LeConte Lodge, and to do so in an open session. The contact list is attached. Note that Susana Reyes, Steve Ma, and Dean Wallraff live in California, and perhaps would have more of a stake in LeConte Lodge.

We also suggest you send copies to, and give a telephone call the following persons to request the Board re-consider its decision based on its bylaws violation and changed circumstances:

Michael Brune, Executive Director 415-977-5662,
Dan Chu, Director, Wild America, 202-650-6066,
Aaron Mair 518-209-1492. President

Board of Directors
85 2nd St Fl 2
San Francisco, CA 94105-3456

This Listserv is open to all, but subject to transmission filters [verification message] that screen out junk email. We suggest you send individual emails to each of the board members, especially the Executive Committee (the first five listed below).

Aaron Mair, President
PO Box 2562
Albany, NY 12220-0562

Ms Robin Mann, Vice President
266 Beechwood Dr
Bryn Mawr, PA 19010-1203

Ms Susana Reyes, Secretary
2700 E Chevy Chase Dr
Glendale, CA 91206-1818

Ms Loren Blackford, Treasurer
53 W 68th St
New York, NY 10023-5301

Dr Liz Walsh, Fifth Officer
4903 Love Rd
El Paso, TX 79922-1723

Mr Spencer Black, Board Director
5742 Elder Pl
Madison, WI 53705-2516

Donna Buell, Board Director
2608 Manhattan Blvd
Spirit Lake, IA 51360-7546

Ms Allison Chin, Board Director
38474 Goose Creek Ln
Leesburg, VA 20175-6637

Michael K Dorsey, Board Director
18675 Muirland St
Detroit, MI 48221-2202

Mr Jim Dougherty, Board Director
709 3rd St SW
Washington, DC 20024-3103

Mr Charles E Frank, Board Director
25 Lakeview Ter
Highland Park, IL 60035-5041

Jessica Helm, Board Director
32 Humboldt St
Waltham, MA 02452-6414

Mr Steve Ma, Board Director
439 Colusa Ave
El Cerrito, CA 94530-3326

Margrete Rangnes, Board Director
1319 E St NE
Washington, DC 20002-5429

Mr Dean Wallraff, Board Director
10211 Sunland Blvd
Shadow Hills, CA 91040-1739

Dealing with Weather Modification


Posted by Annie in Opinion, Outdoors, Political, Twain Harte News on July 10, 2015

If you have you been following my posts on Facebook, you would know how concerned I am about our environment and those that have to live in it… namely, all of us. We all have to live here and we are being poisoned almost on a daily basis.

Twain Harte June 2015

Twain Harte June 8, 2015

I can’t tell you how many friends have died from lung cancer — the non-smoking kind, which kills roughly 85%. Non-small cell lung cancer accounts for about 85 percent of lung cancers according to the Lung Cancer Fact Sheet. This is the non-smoking kind. They leave out that little tidbit.

This one skirts the issue: Types and Staging of Lung Cancer

Small cell lung cancer accounts for the remaining 15 percent of lung cancers in the United States. Small cell lung cancer results from smoking even more so than non-small cell lung cancer, and grows more rapidly and spreads to other parts of the body earlier than non-small cell lung cancer. It is also more responsive to chemotherapy.”

There should be a period after that last bold portion.  They don’t want you to know – or perhaps they don’t know themselves – that large amounts of aerosolized aluminum particles are being released into the atmosphere. It goes directly to the brain and lungs.  It’s too small to be filtered out and it leads to lung cancer.

2015-06-08 Phone 006

Highway 108 – June 2015

This site just lies. 5 Causes of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers – Oh, maybe these are some causes of lung cancer but certainly not all. This is just not true…

“While cigarette smoking is an undisputed cause of lung cancer…”

I’ve tried calling my congressmen and women. They just don’t care. So, even though they are breaking the Nuremberg laws, until we can prosecute those responsible, we are just going to have to try to live with it. Just how does one go about “living with it”. With the Nuremberg Code, the first item is: 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. I did not give my consent to be experimented on.  Did you?

Chemtrails And Aluminum
Harm Heart, Lungs And Plants
By Ted Twietmeyer

… Much of that material can be from chem-trail fallout from aluminum and barium oxide. What goes up, must come down. And all of us are breathing it. Sickness almost always visits communities within 1-3 days after the spraying has taken place. Headaches, coughs that won’t go away, sore throats and head and upper chest congestion are not uncommon. Your body does not want this metal embedding itself in your respiratory tract. It becomes an irritant.

2015-06-08 Phone 282

East Sonora – June 2015

So, basically we are on our own to fend for ourselves. Believe it or not, there are some things you can do to lessen the geoengineering effects on your body. Here are a few things you can do for yourself and your loved ones.

What step can you take to protect your health?

  1. Avoid contact with the rain. Protect your skin. Use Lugol’s Iodine Solution in any collected rain water before using. Lugol’s Iodine: Treatment and Side Effects is packed full of information. We take Iodoral. It helps my body cope with the radiation and the aluminum.
  2. When you notice the sky hazing over and the sun is totally blocked, limit your time outside, if possible, use your air conditioner if you have one, and recycle inside air so you’re not exposing yourself any more than absolutely necessary. It’s getting ready to come down, when it does you will want to limit exposure.
  3. Use essential oils in your home.  Lemon, Grapefruit, Eucalyptus are great oils to use, even just diffusing lavender will help.  They will help your lungs and freshen the air.
  4. Consider using Colloidal Silver or Alpha Lipoic Acid to help get the heavy metals out of your body. If you have the money and are suffering greatly, you might want to look into chelation therapy.
  5. Put plenty of saturated fats in your diet. Coconut oil, real olive oil, lard, butter, etc… These will help your brain to function and remain alert.
  6. Blow your nose often to help clear out those particulates.
  7. Eat organic fruits and vegetables, especially those on the dirty dozen list.
  8. Be sure to get plenty of magnesium, vitamin D, vitamin C and B-12, as well as any others you feel would be helpful.
  9. Be mindful that aluminum is cumulative in the body, and it will interact with other chemicals and other metals in your body. They react differently because we all have different chemicals in our body.  So protect yourself by limiting your exposure to chemicals in shampoo, soaps and other sources. Start reading labels and make lists.

Everyone’s body is different.  What works for me, may not work for you. One thing is certain we need to build our immune system up so that we can fight the radiation, aluminum and other toxic substances we have no choice but to endure.

Explore: GeoEngineering Watch

Geoengineering Epitomizes Industrialized Suicide

Tags: , , , , , , ,